Bollyhood

It speaks for itself. This stuff is hilarious. Because it what it says we know is true.

The Rise of India

ABCNews did a feature on India when Bush visited, and I just found it. It's a great balanced outsiders view of where India is today, and what India can be in 50 years. It's more complicated, sure, but this guy doesn't have the usual bias.

Snippet:
"You see an explosion of 50 years of pent up aspirations. If you want to know what India feels like today, it's very simple. Pull out a Champagne bottle, shake it for an hour, then take the cork off. You don't want to get in the way of that cork."

Mallu Humor of the Day

There's a state in India, down south, called Kerala. It is known as God's own country. The language they speak (they claim) is The Heavenly Language. Well their accents are heavenly too. We lovingly call these folks "Mallus" (short for malayalis, their language is called malayalam)

This clip takes the cake. Don't listen if you have respiratory trouble or heart problems, The laughing might kill you. (So... is that a lie? lol)


Mallu Hot Stepper

*thanks Sarah!

Lying and the Bible - Part 1/3

In a recent conversation with a good friend, the age old issue of whether lying is ever justified was raised, and later I felt like I needed to do a systematic approach in the understanding of the matter.

In addition, I don't want to trust just my own intellect, which is my tendency. Where spiritual matters are concerned, as much as I can I want to rely on the Word of God. If it is undogmatic, I want to be undogmatic. If it is clear, there I want to take a stand.

Outright, I am of the opinion that lying is not justified. But rather than start from that presupposition and give a list of proofs, I want to try and use scripture to gain an understanding. Scripture first, then hypotheses. Of course, my biases probably will show through, but I hope as a whole the logic will be unblemised.

Some Fundamentals

What does the Bible say about lying?

A few passages come to mind.

Exodus 20:16 - You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

Titus 1:2 - in hope of eternal life, which God, who never lies, promised before the ages began.

Heb 6:18 - so that by two unchangeable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie, we who have fled for refuge might have strong encouragement to hold fast to the hope set before us.

Rev 21:8 8 But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.

There are a lot more passages about this throughout scripture, but I think these are sufficient to get an idea that we are commanded not to lie, and that lying is s sin.
God is a God of truth. But as His children, we we are urged to imitate God.

1 Cor 11:1 - Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ.
1 Peter 1:16 - since it is written, “You shall be holy, for I am holy.”

God is our standard for morality. If he is perfectly holy, then we are called to be perfectly holy (whether we can be is not the issue, what we are commanded is). Our sanctification is the process of us becoming like Christ in all his perfection.

The standard is very high. Immediately I realize I cannot attain it. But the difficulty does not mean I stop working out my salvation with fear and trembling. Why? Because it is GOD who is at work in me, not my own effort, so that I can will and act for his good pleasure. I'm not alone in this endeavour (Phil 2:12,13), This is a wonderful manifestation of Grace.

Hang on you say, what about the exceptions? Well, I'm trying to do this a step at a time, and exceptions or complications, however you want to call it, will come later.

So what is a lie? Starting with the bare bone definition, a lie is an active action. You lie simply when you speak what is not true. Even when we speak of "not telling the truth" we are usually not talking about a passive witholding of information, but of untruth being spoken. This is the first aspect of the issue that I want to deal with.

So far, my simple mind is devoid of further issue and I'm happy to submit to scripture - speaking untruth is forbidden. I want to be like Jesus, and this is his demand. I cannot lie. the issue is so far uncomplicated.

Lying and the Bible - Part 2/3

Exceptions?

The first rude awakening occurs when the accounts of Rahab and the Egyptian midwives are thrown at me. Both are examples of people who spoke actual untruth. Both were commended in some way by God. The question is raised whether this can be used as an exception to God's rule of lying.

Rahab: Joshua 2 tells us a wonderful story of God's eternal Grace. A prostitute saw the glory of God through His works for Israel, and she believed. I love verse 11.

11 And as soon as we heard it [of God's power through Israel], our hearts melted, and there was no spirit left in any man because of you, for the Lord your God, he is God in the heavens above and on the earth beneath.

In Joshua chapter 2:5,6 we are presented with this woman, Rahab who speaks untruth in order to save the Jewish spies who are hiding in her house. Her belief in the God of Israel led her to help the spies, and lying was a part of this help. At this point, there would be no real problem. Lying is a sin, and therefore what she did was a sin. The end does not justify the means. We would put this down to another testimony of God's grace in a weak sinner.

There are two verses that raise questions. The first on is Hebrews 11:31.

By faith Rahab the prostitute did not perish with those who were disobedient, because she had given a friendly welcome to the spies.

With regard to the issue at hand, there is no explicit connection. This verse is talking about Rahab's faith in the God of Israel. No mention or endorsement is made of her actions. I believe this verse is a comment on Rahab's attitude in Joshua 2:11. Additionally, we can use a previous verse in the chapter to shed light on our understanding of what was this faith of Rahab.

Hebrews 11:1 - Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.

The second passage about Rahab could raise a few more questions.

James 2:25 - And in the same way was not also Rahab the prostitute justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by another way?

We begin to wonder - was Rahab justified by works, including her lie? This would allow for an argument that said cetain kind of lying is justified. I think the problem arises when we come to a text and try to understand from it what it was never intended to prove or disprove. My solution is simply this - lets look at the passage and understand it's meaning and implications in context.

a. What is the passage about?
We find a clue about this from verse 14 of the same chapter

James 2:14 - What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him?

The point is the one that has been made by great theologians from the ages since the reformation - that we are justified by faith alone, but that faith is NOT ALONE. Deeds must follow our belief. Action proves that we truly believe. Rahab is one of the examples.

b. So why this controversial person as an example?
Why Rahab? Does her inclusion beside Abraham itself mean that all her works on behalf of the Israelites was justified? Lets look at the passage contextually again. First, Abraham is mentioned. He is the father of the Jewish nation. He is the called out one. His is an example of an insider if there ever was one. But to reinforce his point, James puts forward a rank outsider, a pagan, a prostitute, an outcast. And he shows us that even though she had faith (As we have seen in Hebrews 11) her faith was not alone. She staked her life on her belief that Yahweh was Lord. What a set up for his final statement in the chapter - "faith without works is dead".

c. What about her works is justified?
Sticking with the words of scripture, James 2:25 mentions specifically that Rahab welcomed the spies and sent them another way. In simple terms, she helped the people of God. This help was the evidence of her faith. We do not see an endorsement of her lies, or even that somehow she was OK in allowing the soldiers of Jericho to believe that the Jews had come to her for prostitution. All those issues are subsidiary, and not even dealt with in James. We need to say what scripture says and be quiet when it speaks nothing about an issue.

I am reminded of David, the "man after God's own heart". I struggled for a long while with the fact that though David is upheld as one of the great ones in the OT, his life is filled with immorality, inconsistency and lack of faith. What about Abraham? He is noted as an example of justification by faith, and yet the major part of his life is characterized by disbelief and lack of trust. Was there a different standard for these? Did God somehow allow those things then for them, because the situation was different? No! Once again, we see that God is steadfast in his love and gracious to all. His grace covered them ultimately through Christ (Rom 3:21-26)

The Egyptian Midwives:

Exodus 1:19-21 - The midwives said to Pharaoh, “Because the Hebrew women are not like the Egyptian women, for they are vigorous and give birth before the midwife comes to them.” So God dealt well with the midwives. And the people multiplied and grew very strong. And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families.

A similar principle applies here, the favor of God cannot justifiably be used to endorse lies. We have seen God rewarding faith similarly in Abraham, David and Rahab, the weakness of the sinner is covered by Grace. Vs 21 elaborates - they "feared God" and God blessed them.

Edit: To further elucidate, they feared God above man. So when Pharaoh commanded them to kill the Hebrew babies, they refused. This was what God blessed them for. They obeyed him rather than man. That they spoke untruth does not justify it just because they were intending good.

We need to use scripture to interpret scripture, and use the certain to interpret the uncertain, not the reverse. Lying is sin, and we do not have sufficient warrant to add exceptions to a command which is absolute.

Lying and the Bible - Part 3/3

Broader definitions of Lying

So far I have dealt with simply speaking what is true. There is a broader issue however. Deception takes many forms.

1. What about half truths?
2. What about withholding information?
3. What about simple tomfoolery, pranks, games, etc?

Firstly not all these things can really be put into one category as "lying". For instance, withholding information is many times healthy and desirable, for instance in issues of confidentiality, whether spiritual or even military. Wisdom and deception are far removed from each other.
Games are another area - both sides are aware of certain parameters within which to function. There are accepted norms. And in fact, Games have very strict rules and penalties for going outside the bounds. When someone tries to manipulate rules, he is labelled a cheat. Why? Not just because of a transgression of law - that's a foul. Cheating is when the intent is malicious.

So morality and spirituality comes in at the point of intent. If in these cases intent is malicious then sin is born. Whether in areas of Withholding information, half truths, or Game parameters.

Again, we cannot justifiably say that lying or deception is ever endorsed Biblically. Some might take a hard line and label as lies even instances where intent is
not malicious. But I think this muddies the water unprofitably.

It is important to remember that we need to be very careful how we deal with issues out of the boundaries of explicit speaking of untruth. Intent is a hard thing to gauge. But it will be the key in unravelling the matter.

For example, a child may withhold information from a parent because of fear of consequences. The intent is sinful.
But a child may also unwittingly withhold information that might have been pertinent to the issue, simply because the child did not know it was important. The intent then was not sinful.
In this case the discernment and spiritual insight of the parent comes into play.

Final Notes
I need to delve a little into some of the more subjective arguments.
A question was raised about hierarchy of God's law. The logic was that some laws take precedence over others, and for instance if I have to lie to protect someone from being murdered, then that would be justified.

A quick note about this: The only related scriptural examples I can find are these: Children are commanded to obey their parents (Eph 6:1) All people are commanded to be subject to all authorities. (Rom 13:1) However, in each of these instances these is a caveat, if you look at the verses. from this we understand that if people in authority contradict God, then we disobey authority. This is not really teaching hierarchy of law. It is an issue of hierarchy in authority. Whenever God's word is compromised, then I obey God rather than man. So I disobey man, but it is not sin, because God specifically has declared himself supreme authority. Obeying him is of first importance.

As far as lying goes, the hierarchy of authority does not apply, because God as supreme authority has commanded us to be truthful, and there is no issue of submission to any other involved.

Edit: It has been a long while, but I thought I'd add this "mindlblowing revelation" to conclude. With regard to all the exceptions to lying that we might think up to oppose what I believe is a Biblical argument, isn't there a place to say "trust God"? However difficult the situation, if He has decreed something and we seek to obey Him, Can we not rest in knowing that He will provide the means to carry out His will? Or the strength to bear the consequences of obedience to Him? These may be painful in the moment, maybe... but eternally joyous. We serve a living, caring Father. Amen?

The Waiter Rule

USATODAY.com - CEOs say how you treat a waiter can predict a lot about character

As far as the business world goes, it's a sad day if you spend half your life being arrogant and displaying your "power" and shooting people down, just to learn that you have no character...

The waiter rule is an interesting barometer. And not just for business people. Where Christians are concerned, I'd take it to the level of how you treat the lowly in general - not just people who serve you, but people who you benefit nothing from.

I find it sad that I can think of situations where people in ministry leadership fail the test. That's even sadder than a characterless CEO- It's an absolute tragedy of misguided motives.

Private Blogging

Why have a blog if you aren't going to tell anyone about it? Well, I do realize there's a hypocisy involved in having a blog but wanting it to be private.

Why would anyone have a private Blog? Let me try to unravel this paradox.

- I guess the illusion of privacy is appealing.
- There's the feeling of naughtyness, for lack of a more technical term, that you're doing something quietly in the middle of a great big bustling world of people and no one knows - cheeky, isn't it?
- There's the desire to have a "venting" outlet at hand, and for someone who is on the web a lot, what better venting outlet than a blog.
- It is the firm belief of non-conformists like myself that if we do what everybody is doing the same way as everybody else does it that we have lost a piece of our soul. So we have to be different. What a sad lot it is, being a non-conformist.
- It gives me a topic to blog about.

But it's a moot point, since I gave out my blog address ages ago. I guess now I have to be conscious of what I write because someone might see it.... hahaha. Right. NOW that's an issue.

Joke of the Day

I went into Gus's artificial organ and taco stand. I said "Give me a bladder por favor." The guy said "Is that to go?" I said, "Well what else would I want it for?" -- Emo Phillips

Does Anyone Want to Be an Adult Anymore?

Check out this Article

Al Mohler featured an interesting article - it's long but it's interesting. The obvious question is the one Al raises about Adults holding onto childhood, but there's more, and I can't seem to place a finger on it. On the surface, cultural phenomena like this aren't evil - just maybe the deeper implications are harmful. It's easy to slip into unwarranted judgement of just appearances.

I can't get my head around it all to come up with a decent analysis, it's a bizarre trend. Something that did occur to me is that parents are to model a standard - it's part and parcel of how kids learn character. But we're seeing a generation by generation lowering of the bar - it's not just a lower standard, it's a redefining of what's the standard, what the priorities of parenting are. Check this quote about parenting from the article:

“You have to have a little bit of Dora the Explorer in your life,” he says. “But you can do what you can to mute its influence.” Okay. “And there’s no shame, when your kid’s watching a show, and you don’t like it, in telling him it sucks.” Yeah! There’s no—wait. What? “If you start telling him it sucks, maybe he might develop an aesthetic.” Sorry, son. No more Thomas the Tank Engine for you. Thomas sucks. Stop crying. Daddy’s helping you develop an aesthetic. Now Daddy’s going to go put on some thunder music.

Even the jobs of choice these days might clue us into the social anarchy that seems a result of this unthinking, selfishly hedonistic mindset. At least in the article the jobs that seem to prevail: fashion, music, media, marketing, TV... it's ironic that actually these are probably the most socially impactful career tracks today. We live in a generation that blatantly cares only about itself.

To quote a song: There's something happening here, what it is ain't exactly clear. But it's time we stopped and listened and figured out what's going down.

Maybe it's not a big deal, maybe these issues are culturally relevant to the United States, but the sad truth is maybe it is important, because what's cutting edge hip is going to trickle down to the rest of the globe sooner or later.

Wafa Sultan Interview (Transcript)

Transctipr of Interview

Video of Interview

Whatever your opinion of this, you don't hear Middle Easterners have this kind of discussion too often on a public forum. I hope nothing bad happens to Wafa Sultan.

Free advice from Dogbert

This is from Dilbert's Scott Adams if you don't know.

For all you desperate single guys out there... Dogbert can answer your questions with insight... here's a sampling:

Dear Dogbert,

I need to find a girlfriend, but I am very ugly. How can I find a girl that doesn't care how I look?

Ethan


Dear Heathen,

There are plenty of girls who value character above looks. They are called blind girls. (And) it also helps to be rich.

Sincerely,

Dogbert

This is why I never ask for advice. Especially from cartoon dogs.

Are you not entertained?!!

At the Drive-In Church Photo Essay

Who says our age is wierdly different from any other? Here's a church that has been in existence since the 50s!

Here's my favourite quote

"Church goers are encouraged to bring their pets to the sermon. Dog treats are handed our during collections"

Makes you wonder who thought there was a need for such a church. Some pastor actually woke up one morning, thinking this was a good idea. Gosh. Reality is funnier than fiction.

What does it all mean, this windfall for India?

TIME.com: Why Bush Is Courting India

What does it all mean?
Does it mean that I won't be suffering from power cuts (when I'm 60)?
Does it mean that my children will go to the united states without a Visa? (or that by then the rush will be for people to come to INDIA rather than the US, lol)
Does it mean that India will fulfil it's dream about being a superpower by 2020? (a rough interpretation of what "superpower" means is needed here)
Does it mean that someone out there is going to get really, really rich?
Does it mean that poverty is going to be eradicated in india (by nuclear explosions from badly managed plants)?

I hope it means something, and that the something is good, and that the good actually reaches the common people some day soon. I do sound cynical, but I'm really truly hopeful.

For You

XI

Here with a Loaf of Bread beneath the Bough,
A Flask of Wine, a Book of Verse-and Thou
Beside me singing in the Wilderness-
And Wilderness is Paradise enow.

Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam

The Melancholic Waiter

A great post from a compassionate catholic waiter. There're lessons to learn everywhere. This guy writes well. And he doesn't know the Lord.

Heaven & Hell

Good News - Part One

Heads Up. This might be a long one.

What is the Biblical Gospel in a simple, logical, un-cliched, reasonable form? What is Christianity as defined by the Bible? Well, here's what I think is what it boils down to - this, in the form of a Q & A. I'm starting with a presupposition that the Bible IS the only authoritative word of God. I could have gone into a lot more detail, but I'm trying to outline a basic, clear explanation.

My main purpose in this blog post is remembrance - there is rich joy in contemplating the work of Jesus in my life. I have found that it is essential to stay close to the cross if I want to remain devoted to Jesus. This is the basis of my faith, my love, my hope, my passion.

This post is in three parts: This is part 1.

PART I: The Need for Salvation.

Question 1: What have God and man have to do with each other? Who decided that there needed to be this connection - that man somehow is compelled to come to God?

Answer: Three issues.

Issue a. Isaiah 43:7
everyone who is called by my name,
whom I created for my glory,
whom I formed and made.”

There's a simple principle found here. God created all things. We are immediately confronted with the notion of accountability. The created owes its existence to the creator.

Issue b. Colossians 1:16
For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities-all things were created through him and for him.

So we fine-tune the previous thought a little. Not only does all of creation owe its existence to God, but the purpose of all things is to give pleasure to God.
We're not only speaking now about accountability, but about specific duty. God created all things (not just man) to be actively giving him (God) pleasure. To "glorify" him. As a side note, this is what creation implicity does by just "being" (Psalm 19:1 - "The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork".)the intricacy and beauty of creation gives glory to its creator.

Issue c. Genesis 1:26
Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.
The implications of this verse are very specific, because not only do they point to a special purpose for man's creation above and over the rest of creation, but they imply a means by which man can fulfil his purpose differently than the rest of creation (the purpose, as we have seen is the pleasure, the Glory, of God).
Man is in the image of God - this means not that he is God, but that unlike the rest of creation he can think, he can love, he can feel, he can have relationship connitively, by choosing to. In specific, actual ways, He can glorify God with words, with thoughts, with specifically chosen actions.
Also implied is God's tender love and special care when he created man.

Herein lies the uniqueness and specific purpose of man.


Question 2: Ok, so there is a connection between God and man. Man is accountable and his main purpose is to glorify God. So, what's the problem? Can't we just try to please him the best we can, as he intended us to?

Answer: There's a couple of issues we need to understand before we're ready to tackle the idea of glorifying God.

Issue a. The Character of God

Holy - Isaiah 6:1-5
In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him stood the seraphim. Each had six wings: with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. And one called to another and said:
“Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts;
the whole earth is full of his glory!”
And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts!
This is one of the phenomenal passages in scripture. Isaiah the prophet saw God. And this was his experience. The one thing that stands out is God's utter, unadulterated holiness. Even the perfect angels have to cover themselves in the presence of God. The idea of Holiness here is not just purity, but "otherness" - that God is set apart, above and beyond all else. And absolute purity is just an aspect of his holiness. It is this God who desires man to glorify him.

God's Standard - Leviticus 11:44
For I am the Lord your God. Consecrate yourselves therefore, and be holy, for I am holy.Man or woman can only fulfil his/her purpose in the context of God's holiness. Because God is so utterly holy, only a perfectly holy life will give him pleasure, will truly glorify him.

Issue b. The Fact of sin

Adam's Sin - Genesis 3:1-7
Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’” But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate. Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked. And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths.
Man and woman were created perfect, in the image of God, with an unhindered ability to glorify God. The situation was perfect. No issue, no unholiness present. But by one act of disobedience, the situation changed drastically. It is only once we have a proper understanding of God from passages like Isaiah 6 (above) that this makes sense. Man's one sin put a permanent block between him and God. No longer was man's life pleasing to God, no longer could man fulfil his purpose of existence.

You might ask, "What's that to me, If the first humans God created sinned? I was not there, I had nothing to do with it!" It's a valid question, and the Bible provides an answer. Romans 5:12: Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned sin came to all, through that one man, Adam. The point here is that all human beings are now, as it were genetically "birthmarked" or stamped with sin. It is the characteristic of who we are, inherently, at birth. King David understood it well when he confessed his sin to God - Psalm 51:5 Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity,
and in sin did my mother conceive me. Born in sin, because of Adam. All of us, without exception, are marked, and therefore, separated from God, unable to please him. This is what I mean by the "fact of sin".

Issue c. The Act of Sin

Romans 3:23
for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of GodSee, we're not just marked even at birth by sin, we all, without exception faced with actual sin in our lives. Who of us can claim to be without sin? The Bible is clear that all have actually, physically, committed acts of sin. There is not much argument needed here. And so we're double sinful - both by just being human, and secondly, also by choosing to sin.

Sin is defined here as "falling short" of God's glory (see verse). To jump across a chasm, even an inch short means death. Same with sin - it results in both physical death, as we see in our own failing bodies, as well as eternal spiritual death. This, in short is the crisis. Because of factual and actual sin, we're unable to glorify God with the standard of perfect holiness that is required, which is our purpose for being.


Question 3: Well, I understand that sin is a problem. But I still don't quite understand what the big deal is... I mean, why can't I just do my best and can't God be merciful?

Answer: Sin has very serious effects that need to be understood if this question is to be tackled Biblically.

Issue a. Sin in Relation to God
James 2:10
For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become accountable for all of it. We've seen God's holy standard. But in addition to this, even one single disobedience to God's law means that we are in disobediece to all of God's law. It's all or nothing.
Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
We saw from Romans 3:23 that sin prevents us from perfectly glorifying God. But it is important to understand that sin is not just a barrier that prevents us from communion with God. On the basis of sin being disobedience to all of God's law, we can see in this verse that it's not only a barrier, it's a crime. And crime demands punishment, and for us the "wage" is death.

Issue b. Sin with Relation to Man
Ephesians 2:1-3
And you were dead in the trespasses and sins in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience— among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind. Sin is not only punished by physical death and eternal death, Sin causes spiritual death. The idea is of total inability. Dead things dont do anything. We're dead in sin, and without life, there is no possibility of us being able to do anything of ourselves to please God. This is our state without God.
In addition to this, because we have committed a crime before the Holy God, not only are we under punishment, but under his wrath, as the verse suggests. The Bible talks about judgement in very clear terms: Hebrews 9:27 - And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment... We will all be called to answer, and by ourselves, we will bear the punishment for our sins. This is righteous, this is just.
Here are some more verses about what our sin has done to us: Romans 8:7,8 - For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot. Those who are in the flesh cannot please God.

This is where all men and women stand without God. This is the state of all humans - dead, unable to act, hostile to God, under the wrath of God, hopelessly lost, destined for eternal punishment.

Revelation 20:11-15
Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. From his presence earth and sky fled away, and no place was found for them. 12 And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Then another book was opened, which is the book of life. And the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to what they had done. 13 And the sea gave up the dead who were in it, Death and Hades gave up the dead who were in them, and they were judged, each one of them, according to what they had done. 14 Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. 15 And if anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.

This is in clear Biblical terms, why we NEED to be saved.

She's got a ticket to ride....

This is satirical... please don't ask me silly questions.

Have you ever wanted to get away with almost anything? To have a ticket to inculpability, as it were, that lets you do mostly what you want with blissful abandon? Just thinking about such a thing makes me fear a world of anarchy and lawlessness. But the most devastating truth lies in the fact that this thing has existed for aeons, right under our noses. Women have "it" and it comes in the form of 4 worrisome words - "It's a Girl Thing". And the ones who suffer the brunt of this assault are men (and maybe very manly women, but that's for another day).

For example:

Woman: "Can I take your credit card and shop till we're in three decades of debt?"
Well, the man to whom this is addressed would ordinarily, if in his right mind, not even consider the possibility of this being a serious question. But then the trump card:
Woman: "It's a Girl Thing".
All of a sudden, there is no argument. The question WAS serious, and the credit card is handed over, along with the wallet and ID and 50 signed blank checks. It's like magic.

Or another example:

Consider this scenario - A man pulls a Three Stooges and makes a complete fool of himself. Justly, he can expect nothing but grief from his woman. It's what should happen. And it's what usually does, as most men will know.
But turn it around: The woman does a Lucy. Ahah! The man is ready with guns drawn: it's payback time. But then those ill-fated words "sorry dear, it's a woman thing". All of a sudden the man joins the woman on the table, and sings Cuban party songs, Desi Arnaz style.

There is a strange power here. Logic has nothing to do with it. But imagine the possibilities if this is properly harnessed.

Think about the Cold War. Had either the US or Russia decided to be smart, they would have installed a female leader. Said country would then be free to do what they wanted, no threat of war.

For Example, if Russia had a female leader:

High Level Phone Call from male US Premier to Russian Premier: "Um... Madam, you've just launched a nuclear missile, and it seems to be heading toward Texas"
Russian Reply: "Yes, Comrade, it's a woman thing".
American Response: "Uh... Ok.... I guess we can do without ONE state. Hope you feel better! I'm sending you flowers."

And so there is peace in the world, even if the US is less one section of real estate. However, if BOTH the US and Russia were to install a leader of the Feminine type, then that would be a whole different story, and I don't Imagine I would be around to type this little satire, or that you would be around to read it. At least not with the normal number of limbs or heads.

I'm still trying to figure out the point of this whole spiel, but I would imagine somewhere in here is the realization that us men just need to suck it up - sure life has a few Texas-sized smoking holes, but small price to pay for peace.

I better end this, I have no ticket to indemnity.

Wow... I like these people already

That there's a site like this one - with huge money poured into it and so much content dedicated to it makes me happy. I want to curl up under warm blankets and depart into my dreams for a while, without guilt. Hey! I'm not lazy after all! People are paid to promote the importance of such things!

Love at First Bite [The Publisher’s Ring]

Are these people for REAL? What in the world is wrong with the people in the world, and why is it that white people come up with some of the most bizzare ideas of love? Hollywood was bad enough, now reality takes it to a whole new level. Love at First Bite [The Publisher’s Ring] will shock you and send you into the other room screaming for mercy. They call this love. Oh my.

EDIT: Apparently, it's an April Fools joke, but in extremely bad "taste". And also, sort of hard to decipher considering the content and purpose of the site is about self-mutilation in more acceptable forms.